Student: Critical Thinking and Sensory Data

Assignment 1 sensory(prenominal) PerceptionsCan you really trust your senses and the interpretation of arresting data to give you an undefiled view of the world? Describe and debate the accuracy and the weaknesses of the human senses as they pertain to thinking in general and to your own thinking in particular.Write a two to tercet (23) page (approximately 500750 word) paper that addresses the following 1. Provide at least tercet (3) reasons for believe in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory randomness. 2. Identify and describe at least three (3) factors add to the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory data. 3. Discuss the roles of nature and nurture with regard to the interpretation and military rank of sensory data. 4. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assigning. Your textbook may see as hotshot (1) source. At least one (1) of your sources must be obtained from the collection of databases accessible from the Learning Resources Center Web page. The format of the paper is to be as follows1. Typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman instance (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format. 2. In addition to the two (2) pages assigned, a title page with the title of the assignment, your name, the instructors name, the course title, and the date is to be included, as well as a Reference Page. Sources documented using APA style for in-text citations and listed on the References Page using APA style format. Assignment 1 Sensory Perceptions callable Week 2 and worth 100 pointsCan you really trust your senses and the interpretation of sensory data to give you an accurate view of the world? Describe and discuss the accuracy and the weaknesses of the human senses as they pertain to thinking in general and to your own thinking in particular. Write a 2-3 page paper in which you1. Provide at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. 2. Identify and describe at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory data. 3. Discuss the roles of nature and nurture with regard to the interpretation and evaluation of sensory data. 2010 Strayer University, All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University underground and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed indite permission of Strayer University. PHI 210 Student Version 1134 1071 04-11-11 Page 6 of 314. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Your textbook may count as one (1) source. At least one (1) of your sources must be obtained from the collection of databases accessible from the Learning Resources Center Web page.Your assignment must Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any surplus instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the students name, the professors name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page argon not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are Develop skills for overcoming barriers which limit objective and nut-bearing critical thinking. Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking. Demonstrate adherence to academic integrity policy and APA Style guidelines for academic citations. Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.Write clearly and concisely about issues in critical thinking using proper writing mechanics.Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points 100 Assignment 1 Sensory PerceptionsCriteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimu m Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A1. Provide at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. Weight 30%Did not submit or incompletely provided at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. Insufficiently provided at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. Partially provided at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. Satisfactorily provided at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. Thoroughly provided at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. 2. Identify and describe at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory data. Weight 30%Did not submit or incompletely identified and describe at least three (3) factor s contributing to the accuracy or Insufficiently identified and described at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or Partially identified and described at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or Satisfactorily identified and described at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or Thoroughly identified and described at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or 3.